OPINIONS
OPINIONS
Andys Loizou*

The purpose of this article is to pay tribute to the heroic dead of the Turkish invasion, the missing persons and the warriors (officers and conscripts) as well as to emphasize the importance of the leadership of each level of command in the Armed Forces during Phase II of the Turkish Invasion.
It is publicly known that the disorganization of the National Guard (NG) and the absolutely wrong, if not traitorous, way that the then leadership of the NG responded to the Turkish aggression on July 20, 1974, resulted in allowing Turkey to disembark on the shores of Kyrenia, causing a large number of innocent victims and occupy much of the Cypriot territory violating the agreed ceasefire.
On August 8, 1974, Major General Efthimios Karagiannis took over the leadership of NG and prepared operational plans after having assessed the situation on the ground. The defence and security of the capital was taken over by the then Colonel George Azinas on the night of August 14. Azinas directed the operations closely, having a full awareness of the tactical operations.
The goal of the Turkish invaders was to occupy the capital of the Republic of Cyprus in order to achieve a magnificent victory and drag the Government into surrender. But they failed owing to the heroism and self-sacrifice of the defenders of the Capital.
Also read: Turkish Policy in a few words (Maps)
The defenders of the line from Gerolakko to Aglantzia kept the Turks away from the free area of Nicosia, causing them very large casualties both in people and equipment, especially in the area of the ELDYK camp, the hills of the Grigoriou School and north of the Kolokasidi roundabout. The Greek-Cypriot forces consisted of three ELDYK companies under the command of Colonel (Col) Stavroulopoulou Panagiotis, which were placed under command of the 3rd Supreme Tactical Command (STC) from August 11. Also, the 212 Infantry Battalion, under the command of Major Achillidi Constantinos with Captains A. Pasiardis, C. Chatzidamianou and Lieutenant (Lt) K. Michopoulos and the troops of Lieutenant Polyzou (under the Command at 212 Infantry Battalion since August 15, 1974).
With this report, I do by no means want to downgrade the contribution of the 211 Infantry Battalion Unit under the Command of Lieutenant Colonel (Lt Col) Lianantonakis Emmanouil, 336 Infantry Battalion under the Command of Major Aleuromachirou Dimitrios, Captain’s Ligoudistianou Company near Ledra Pallas and 391 Infantry Battalion (under the command of the III STC on August 15 in the area north of the roundabout of Nicosia-Famagusta Street). In addition, I mention the contribution of T-34 tanks platoon west of the Gregoriou School as well as the 187 Artillery Battalion under the Command of Lt Col Tarantilis Panagiotis who supported the area ELDYK – KOLOKASIDI with fire. Also, I mention the 184 Artillery Battalion under the command of Sevaslidi Konstantinou which inflicted heavy casualties to the enemy.
It is worth noting the entry into battle of the Battle Group commanded by Lt Col Katerinaki (386 – 396 Infantry Battalions) in the afternoon of August 16. The 386 Infantry Battalion commanded by Major Konstantinos Panagopoulos entered the battle as support and then replaced the 212 Infantry Battalion (that was engaged continuously). It would be an omission not to mention the contribution of the Heavy Mortars Company units and the Anti-tank Team of the 1st Commando Unit commanded by Lt Nikos Koimtzoglou who came under the command of the 212 Infantry Battalion. It is worth noting that reference is also made to the book PHASE LINE ATTILA (published by the US Marine Corps University Press in 2020) regarding the battle of Nicosia, the strong defence of 212 Infantry Battalion as well as the fight made by the Anti-Tank Platoon of the 1st Commando Unit.
The Turkish casualties were very large despite the fierce and continuous attacks with tanks followed by infantry of TOURDYK and two other Infantry Battalions. These were supported with artillery fire and heavy mortar rounds. In short, these heroes saved Nicosia.
Highly remarkable, after the bravery and self-sacrifice of the heroic fighters, was the Command at all levels from the Team level to the III Supreme Tactical Command. All the Commanders were close to the Units they commanded, were fully aware of the tactical situation and commanded their divisions in a way that caused casualties to the enemy and prevented the latter from achieving its Objective.
Direct communication between the various Commands during the operations and, of course, the knowledge of the battlefield as well as the monitoring of the development of the operations are of primary importance. Unfortunately, we had the opposite case in the first phase of the Turkish invasion.
*Colonel (Ret)
Also read:
Opinion Article | Turkey’s Participation in European Defence: National Failure or National Opportunity?
On 27 May 2025, the General Affairs Council of the European Union (EU), despite opposition from Greece and Cyprus, decided by qualified majority — rather than unanimity…
Opinion article | The Institutional Deficit in the National Defence Industry – Turkey Has the SSB – Cyprus Has a Council – Greece Has a gap
My presence at the international Defence and Security exhibition FEINDEF in Madrid was not just another business mission. It was a cause for reflection.
Opinion | Understanding the Adversary
“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you…
Denmark | Trial of Voyager Surveillance USVs in the North and Baltic Seas
Denmark has recently deployed two unmanned surface vessels (USVs), developed and operated by a U.S. company, to enhance surveillance efforts in the Baltic Sea and North Sea.
ALTUS LSA | Included in the List of the Top 100 Drone Defence Companies of 2025
The Defense Post has recently unveiled its definitive list of the Top 100 Companies Advancing Drone Technology, with Altus LSA proudly representing…
Lockheed Martin – KAI | Expansion of Strategic Relationship
Lockheed Martin and Korea Aerospace Industries (KAI) signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) at the 2025 Paris Air Show on 17 June, to…
RTX, Kongsberg, and Norway Showcase Ghosteye Radar at Paris Air Show 2025
Raytheon, a business of RTX (NYSE: RTX), in collaboration with the Norwegian government and Kongsberg Defence and Aerospace, has announced…
Rheinmetall – Anduril Industries | Strategic Partnership to Co-Develop and Deliver a Suite of Autonomous Systems
Rheinmetall and Anduril Industries have announced a strategic partnership to jointly develop and deliver a comprehensive suite of autonomous systems.
MBDA | One-Way Effector Designed to Saturate Enemy’s Air Defence
At the 2025 Paris Air Show, MBDA is unveiling its One-Way Effector.
0 Comments